The NY Times reports "In 2003, of all new mortgages, 10.2 percent were interest-only." 10% of Americans "bought" a house where not only does the bank really own it (the case for most of us), but they are doing nothing to buy it away from the bank, just paying the interest on the loan. What's the point? All interest-only mortgages do is enable speculation and waste the money of those too desparate to lose it. Outlawing them would do more good than harm.
The article continues "According to Loan Performance, a research firm, 26.7 percent of all loans were interest-only (in 2005) and another 15.3 percent were payment-option adjustable rate mortgages, which allow homeowners to choose how much they paid each month."
So the percentage was meaningful in 2003 and has grown since then. What could possibly go wrong?
Saturday, July 15, 2006
Feed
About Me
- Name: Mateu
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
Stampeding Caribou dislodged the ice floe where I had been frozen for 71 years. I landed on the shore of Īles-de-la-Madeleine where a motel manager promptly gave me a job cleaning bathrooms. After three years of saving tips and stealing change left by lodgers, I paid my way to America. Seeking toilet scrubbing work in Owego, NY, I accidentally boarded a bus to Lake Oswego, OR. Now I live in Portland.
Previous Posts
- Graph of the year (decade?) so far: the economy w...
- Fortunately, life got busy during a slow news time...
- With all the huge and absurdly bad things Bush doe...
- The NY Times reported March 26th on a fantastic ap...
- Here's a variety of interesting money calculators,...
- While rather long and dry, this speech by Congress...
- I remain a bit stumped how the middle class has no...
- Wow. Here's a mind-blowingly elegant idea from Ga...
- John Mauldin, author of Bulls-Eye Investing, Just ...
- In his February 27th letter, Morgan Stanley Chief ...

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home